Missing institutions
I feel that our society exposes citizens to raw edges of markets. There must be a way to blunt the effects of markets on people. Markets are a good thing but they have unintended effects on people's livelihoods.
+
–
–
This question is to highlight the missing institutions of society. Things that don't exist that should.
子カテゴリはありません。
+[概念]
方法 UE: United Entities
Just like the UN, but inclusive of non-countries: corporations, individuals, etc.
+[発想]
+[企画]
「マーケットアクセス」や「補助金」など、任意の小さなことを気にする機関を考えることができます。しかし、西側の世界が選択したように見える最適化の方法は、敗者の成長を育てたり助けたりするのではなく、勝者を進化させてスクリーニングすることに依存しています。これもダーウィニズムの最適化の考え方から来ていると思います。その新しい考え方を生み出すには、敗者を次のように考える必要があります。外れ値-異常な可能性のある種子-なぜなら、彼らが敗者である理由は、おそらく、彼らが本質的に不適当であるという理由ではなく、間違った土壌にいるからです。その考えから、未開拓の才能や視点を掘り起こすことに焦点を当てた「外れ値の育成」のための機関のようなものが発明されるかもしれません。
One can think of an institution to care about arbitrary little thing, for example, "Market Access" or "Subsidy". However, the very way of optimization that the Western world seem to have chosen, relies on evolving and screening for the winners, not nurturing and helping the losers to grow up. I think, it again comes from the Darwinian Optimization mentality, and to create that new mentality, we've got to think of the losers as the outliers, -- seeds with unusual potential -- because, the reasons why they are losers, perhaps, is because they are in the wrong soil, not because they are inherently unfit. With that thinking, something like an institution for "Nurture of Outliers" focused on mining untapped talent and perspectives may be invented.
人々が失敗の原因を発見した、失敗したすべてのビジネスの事後分析。
失敗した事業計画は0で、失業は0であるはずです（例外的な原因を除く）。
社会は壊れにくいものでなければなりません。
A post mortem on every failed business ever where people discover what caused them to fail.
We should have 0 failed business plans and 0 job losses (except for exceptional causes).
Society should be antifragile.