[PFE] "identifications" of Product moving dimensions
The 5-IN 5-OUT steps of product dna and id (testing)
Objective: Security, Fitness, improvement (not ~~growth~~), territory, regeneration.
1- uninterrupted communication between designers and producers
2- minimize time from 0-to>1
3- increase ecosystem fitness
this loop determines fitness if ecosystem
Proposition:
Identify the dimensional axises of a circular product in motion and redraw the dimensions that will allow for maximum gain in maximum joy taking in consideration all the new fragmented Types, Categories and Attributes...
This is a process to find the raw new basics , hopefully asap.
5IN/5OUT Product detail is a communication tool, //[under validation and evaluation]
To streamline communications and facilitate transactions to "fittest" "cycle" possible; (fitness correlations between # of units and time and volume ...
Challenge: instructions being followed exactly
5 IN is: (production facing, pull)
(graphic, measurements, MOQ frequency, Story, Initiator, rights of use) (this is the main contract document of in/out)
1- Product ID
2- BOM
2- Costing
3- Pattern & Steps
4- Quality specifications and rules
5- How to package and ship
5 OUT are: (consumer facin, push)
c1- ID card (graphic, measurement, Story, Maker(s), Initiator, Rights of use) (this is the main contract document of in/out)
c2- Packaging, shipping, handeling pick-up locations info
c3-Wash & Care instructions, guarantee info,maintenance
c4- How to dispose of instructions (recycling spots, plans etc)
c5- Communities involved, the movers
Channels: platform
Single source of truth for all products production info VS. multi-source of the truth and multi-channels.
Point A is: idea point B is manifested.
Goal: shortest distance from A to B
With more n more entities involved
omitted lines: What is the minimum effort for achieving flow and timeless process in industry. ,
DOCTORAL T H E S I S Diana Chronéer, Luleå University of Technology, 2005
アイデアは明確な解決策であり、意識の生の流れ、それについての反省、またはそれについての個人的なメモではありません...
// [新しいリストは何ですか?トランジット中およびそれ以降?]
アイデアは質問ではありません。ルールをお読みください。
「私のプロセス」のセクションでは、それが主題にされて説明された場合、アイデアになる可能性のある何かを説明しているようです。
今のところ、あなたの「アイデア」は、ここでの重要な提案が何であるかについてのヒントがない、未完成の一連の思考のように見えます。
何を提案していますか?アイデアの主張は何ですか?
Ideas are meant to be articulated solutions, not raw streams of consciousness, reflections about or personal notes about it...
// [what are the new lists? in transitus and beyond?]
Ideas are not supposed to be questions: please, read the rules.
At the section "my process" you seem to describe something that could be an idea, if it were made into a subject and explained.
Right now, your "idea" looks like an unfinished sequence of thoughts without a hint at what is the key proposition here.
What are you proposing? What is the claim of the idea?
編集しました。もっと明確ですか?乾杯。
Edited it. Is it more clear? Cheers.
はい、それははるかに明確です[Bassxn2]!編集していただきありがとうございます。今では理にかなっています。
Yes, it is much more clear [Bassxn2]! Thanks for the edits. It now makes sense.