Adversarial companies
Adversarial companies are adversarial companies designed to topple international organisations funded by governments
If competition is good, then it follows that...
Big companies rarely do things efficiently or fairly, they don't compete.
We should make big companies sweat by writing a blank check for companies designed to topple other big companies to do things better than them.
+[企画]
ええと、大小を問わず、企業は政府に登録されていれば、政府のツールです。通常、大規模で繁栄している企業は、経営への信頼によってそのようになり、単一の製品ではなく、管理されている多数の製品やチームを表すため、企業自体というよりはポートフォリオのようなものです。
ここで、競合他社を作成するとします。これは、競合するポートフォリオ管理を作成することを意味します。
それで、誰に小切手を書くべきですか？別の競合するポートフォリオマネージャー（それは彼らが財政的に競合するレベルであるため）、またはあなたは単に製品ごとの競争を意味しますか？製品面での競争の場合、スタートアップに資金を提供することはすでに設立への圧力を生み出しますが、スタートアップを買収しているので、それは一般的に設立への財政的競争ではありません。
Well, companies, big or small, are tools of governments, if registered with them. Usually, large and prosperous companies become such because of trust in management, and represent not a single product, but a number of products and teams being managed, so, they are more like portfolios rather than companies per se.
Now, suppose you want to create a competitor company. That means creating a competing portfolio management.
So, who should we write the check to -- another competing portfolio manager (as that's the level at which they would be financially competing), or you just mean product-wise competition? If product-wise competition, then funding startups already creates pressure to establishment, but that is not generally a financial competition to the establishment, as they are buying up startups, make them part of their management portfolios.